Integrated Annual Report 2025

Focus Topics – Social issues

Sustainable purchasing

Impacts, risks, and opportunities

Impacts

Given the complexity of our supply chain and the involvement of thousands of suppliers, negative impacts can occur. Increased environmental and social risks are particularly evident in sectors such as logistics, electronics, and raw material extraction. Social challenges such as health and safety risks, forced labour, child labour, and modern slavery disproportionately affect vulnerable groups of workers, including migrant workers, young employees, women, and trade unionists.

While no specific factories or countries have yet been identified, Zehnder Group’s human rights due diligence has highlighted potential risks within the supply chain. To prevent and mitigate these risks, Zehnder Group applies its Supplier Code of Conduct and regular sustainability audits to ensure compliance with, and continuous improvement of, environmental and social standards.

Despite these challenges, participation in a global supply chain also brings positive effects. In regions with a strong focus on artisanal mining, which carries serious risks, this sector offers opportunities for job creation and related employment and training, as well as economic opportunities.

Risks and opportunities

The introduction of a new supplier invariably brings with it a number of additional risks and vulnerabilities; addressing these requires a considerable investment of resources. The inclusion of social factors in supply chain management adds layers of complexity to procurement processes. Failure to address these risks may result in reputational damage, given the growing expectations of high ethical standards among all stakeholders.

However, Zehnder Group can strengthen its reputation as a responsible business partner by promoting fair working conditions, protecting vulnerable groups, and ensuring transparent corporate governance. The Group can also take advantage of its close, trusting collaborations with established suppliers to reduce risk, ensure product quality, and advance joint sustainability initiatives, encouraging partners to align themselves with sustainability goals in the process.

Management approach

To ensure that suppliers share our commitment to sustainability and are transparent about their environmental and social impacts, Zehnder Group is strengthening relationships with suppliers. Social, environmental, and economic criteria are increasingly integrated into purchasing decisions to improve supply chain transparency. Currently, human rights and environmental due diligence primarily focus on direct suppliers and is applied on a risk-based basis. The intention is to progressively extend coverage to Tier 2 and beyond.

Zehnder Group’s procurement team, led by the CFO and Director Group Procurement, coordinates Group-wide initiatives and embeds sustainability across sourcing, contracting, and supplier management. In close collaboration with the Sustainability Steering Committee, it reports progress and challenges against the company’s sustainability goals. To prepare Zehnder Group’s procurement teams for the ESG challenges that can arise in complex supply chains, the company provides training on sustainability issues. This contributes to the assurance and promotion of responsible procurement.

Supplier Code of Conduct

Our Supplier Code of Conduct is based on global standards, such as the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the ILO, as well as the UNGPs. It is also informed by the findings of our double materiality assessment and human rights due diligence. It establishes clear expectations for suppliers regarding ESG issues and requires them to sign a binding declaration to the Code of Conduct or an equivalent standard.

We strive to build long-term, trusting partnerships that adhere to the Code of Conduct. These partnerships are based on dialogue and cooperation, rather than financial pressure. This includes jointly developing solutions and providing support in implementing sustainable practices when difficulties arise in complying with the Code.

Risk-based screening and audits

Our aim is to audit direct-material suppliers before they are onboarded, when they present higher sustainability risk or uncertainty or are extremely important to our business in size, potential, or dependency. We use a risk-based assessment to identify those suppliers that require further investigation. By combining public country and category risk indices with our own evaluations, we determine where further investigation and more intensive audits are necessary.

The audits cover ESG criteria to ensure that suppliers’ sustainability commitments are consistently implemented. Audit processes are continuously updated to ensure compliance with the latest standards and to continuously improve the initial assessments.

Transparency and engagement

Trusting and cooperative partnerships with suppliers are crucial for transparency in the supply chain, particularly with Tier 2 suppliers where risks can be more difficult to identify. Such partnerships enable Zehnder Group to support its suppliers in improving their environmental responsibility, working conditions, and governance standards, helping Zehnder Group achieve its sustainability goals.

Open communication is vital to identify and resolve significant problems in the supply chain and to ensure transparency. Zehnder Group facilitates this by providing open communication channels for all employees along the value chain. An Integrity Line (further information under Compliance and fair business practices), for example, allows anonymous reports and concerns to be raised. While there have been no reported significant negative effects to date, Zehnder Group remains committed to providing ongoing support and assistance in the event of any issues.

Implementation and outlook

Implementation of the above management approach and policies is structured around one focus area with five defined targets and KPIs.

Targets

Ambition: Ensure suppliers apply the same sustainability ambitions as we do and are transparent about their environmental and social impacts along the value chain

Target: Implement a Zehnder Group supply chain due diligence and risk management standard operating procedure

Target: Signed Supplier Code of Conduct by significant direct suppliers

Target: On-site audit of high-risk suppliers

1 In-scope direct material suppliers are defined as direct material suppliers with a yearly spend of more than EUR 5000.

Metrics

GRI 204: Procurement Practices 2016
Disclosure 204-1 Proportion of spending on local suppliers

Indicator description

Unit of measure

2025

2024

Change from prior year

2023

Change from base year

Percentage of the procurement budget used for significant locations of operation1 that is spent on suppliers local2 to that operation

%

62.0

66.0

–4.0

pp

63.0

–1.0

pp

Data relies in part on spend and market forecasts.

The 2023 and 2024 figures have been restated due to a revised methodology to collect the data. For our central entity, a plant-level assessment was applied rather than relying on the entity’s country of registration, providing a result closer to operational reality. The original reported figures were 52.0% for 2024 and 54.0% for 2023.

1Significant locations of operation are defined as business units representing above 5% of total spend.

2Local here is defined as by country.

GRI 308: Supplier Environmental Assessment 2016
Disclosure 308-1 New suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria

Indicator description

Unit of measure

2025

2024

Change from prior year

2023

Change from base year

Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria

%

-

-

-

-

-

Since the SOP implementation has not yet occurred, the KPI for environmental screening is currently zero.

GRI 308: Supplier Environmental Assessment 2016
Disclosure 308-2 Negative environmental impacts in the supply chain and actions taken

Indicator description

Unit of measure

2025

2024

Change from prior year

2023

Change from base year

Number of suppliers assessed for environmental impacts

#

23

27

–14.8

%

24

–4.2

%

Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts

#

1

-

n/a

-

n/a

Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment1

%

4.3

-

4.3

pp

-

4.3

pp

Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment2

%

-

-

-

-

-

1 One supplier did not meet the audit requirements. Mandatory improvement actions were issued, and the supplier has been provided with an appropriate timeline to implement the required changes.

2Zero supplier relationships were terminated due to potential and actual negative environmental impacts. We recognise our responsibility to those potentially affected by negative impacts and aim to address significant adverse effects with our suppliers, benefiting all parties. Termination of a business relationship is considered only as a last resort.

GRI 414: Supplier Social Assessment 2016
Disclosure 414-1 New suppliers that were screened using social criteria

Indicator description

Unit of measure

2025

2024

Change from prior year

2023

Change from base year

Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria

%

-

-

-

-

-

Since the SOP implementation has not yet occurred, the KPI for social screening is currently zero.

GRI 414: Supplier Social Assessment 2016
Disclosure 414-2 Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken

Indicator description

Unit of measure

2025

2024

Change from prior year

2023

Change from base year

Number of suppliers assessed for social impact

#

23

27

–14.8

%

24

–4.2

%

Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts

#

1

-

n/a

-

n/a

Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment1

%

4

-

4.3

pp

-

4.3

pp

Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment2

%

-

-

-

-

-

1 One supplier did not meet the audit requirements. Mandatory improvement actions were issued, and the supplier has been provided with an appropriate timeline to implement the required changes.

2Zero supplier relationships were terminated due to potential and actual negative social impacts. We recognise our responsibility to those potentially affected by negative impacts and aim to address significant adverse effects with our suppliers, benefiting all parties. Termination of a business relationship is considered only as a last resort.

Suppliers that have signed the Supplier Code of Conduct

Indicator description

Unit of measure

2025

2024

Change from prior year

2023

Change from base year

Rate of direct material suppliers that have signed the Supplier Code of Conduct

%

41.9

33.7

8.2

pp

29.1

12.8

pp

Rate of indirect material suppliers that have signed the Supplier Code of Conduct

%

-

-

-

-

-

To the top