Integrated Annual Report 2025

Compensation Report

2. Governance and methods to determine compensation

2.1 Shareholders’ involvement

The Annual General Meeting approves the maximum compensation amounts paid to the Board of Directors and to the Group Executive Committee, each in a binding vote. The provisions of the Articles of Association of Zehnder Group (www.zehndergroup.com/en/investor-­relations/­corporate-governance; Article 15) envisage that the Annual General Meeting votes annually and prospectively on each of the aggregate compensation amounts as follows:

The Articles of Association of Zehnder Group (www.zehndergroup.com/en/investor-­relations/­corporate-governance; Article 31 et seq.) include the following provisions on compensation:

In addition, in accordance with the requirements of the Code of Obligations, shareholders can express their views on the compensation system by means of an annual consultative vote on the compensation report.

2.2 Nomination and Compensation Committee

According to the Articles of Association, on an annual and individual basis, the Annual General Meeting elects at least two and no more than four members of the Board of Directors to the Nomination and Compensation Committee for a term of office of one year until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting. Members are eligible for re-election. At the 2025 Annual General Meeting, the shareholders elected the following members of the Nomination and Compensation Committee:

Executive/Independent/Non-independent member of the BoD

Chairman/ Member

Riet Cadonau

Independent member of the BoD

Chairman

Sandra Emme

Independent member of the BoD

Member

Milva Inderbitzin-Zehnder

Non-independent member of the BoD1

Member

BoD: Board of Directors

1Related to the representative of the controlling majority shareholder; holds – directly and indirectly – a 0.3% share of total Zehnder Group AG votes.

The responsibilities of the Nomination and Compensation Committee are set out in the Articles of Association (www.zehndergroup.com/en/investor-relations/corporate-governance; Article 26) and Organisational Regulations (www.zehndergroup.com/en/investor-relations/corporate-governance; Article 4.3.) and include the following duties with reference to compensation:

The levels of authority, held by the Nomination and Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors and the Annual General Meeting are summarised by the following table.

Responsibility levels

CEO

NCC

BoD

AGM

Compensation policy and principles

Proposes

Approves

Total compensation amounts of BoD and GEC

Proposes

Reviews

Approves (binding vote)

Individual compensation of members of the BoD

Proposes

Approves

Compensation of CEO

Proposes

Approves

Individual compensation of other members of the GEC

Proposes

Reviews

Approves

Compensation Report

Proposes

Approves

Advisory vote

BoD: Board of Directors; CEO: Chief Executive Officer; GEC: Group Executive Committee; NCC: Nomination and Compensation Committee; AGM: Annual General Meeting

The Nomination and Compensation Committee meets as often as business matters require, generally before meetings of the entire Board of Directors, which take place at least four times a year. In 2025, the Nomination and Compensation Committee met four times, for an average of one and a half hours, generally with the participation of all members and with the support of Group HR.

In general, the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors as well as the CEO attend the meetings in an advisory capacity. The Chairman of the Nomination and Compensation Committee may invite other executives as appropriate. However, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the executives do not participate in the meetings or parts thereof if their own compensation and/or performance is under discussion. After each meeting, the Chairman of the Nomination and Compensation Committee reports to the Board of Directors on the activities of the Committee. The minutes of the Committee meetings are available to the Board of Directors.

The Nomination and Compensation Committee is entitled to involve external consultants regarding specific compensation-related matters. In 2025, the Nomination and Compensation Committee has not engaged any external consultants or specialist for a specific compensation-related topic.

2.3 Method to determine compensation

The compensation of the Board of Directors is reviewed every three years, most recently in 2023. The benchmark analysis from 2023 carried out by Willis Towers Watson was used to define the benchmark companies in a more precise manner. Parameters such as threshold and cap in terms of market capitalisation, turnover, and number of employees have been defined, alongside the criteria of operating in the same or similar industry, stock exchange listing, having headquarters in Switzerland, and business activities in the same or a similar geographical scope. The following companies were therefore selected for comparison: Arbonia, Belimo, Bossard, Burckhardt Compression, Burkhalter, Bystronic, Daetwyler, Feintool, Forbo, Gurit, Huber+Suhner, Interroll, Kardex, Komax, Landis+Gyr, Meier Tobler, Phoenix Mecano, Rieter, Schweiter Technologies, Tecan, VAT Group, Vetropack, and V-ZUG.

The result of the analysis has confirmed the level of compensation with no adjustment to the fixed annual retainer nor to the fixed cash compensation for membership of committees of the Board of Directors. The review took into consideration the additional duties of the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the additional responsibility of the Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors as Lead Independent Director.

The compensation of Group Executive Committee members is also regularly benchmarked against that of executives from comparable international industrial companies in order to ensure competitive compensation levels that enable key talent to be attracted and motivated on a long-term basis. Executives who attain the defined performance objectives are generally awarded target compensation at market median level of the relevant benchmark data.

The benchmark data constitute just one of the factors taken into consideration by the Nomination and Compensation Committee when determining the compensation of members of the Group Executive Committee. Additional factors are also considered, such as the internal compensation structure (equity), the profile of the Group Executive Committee member (skill set, experience), and the responsibilities borne by that member. The performance of the company in any given year has a direct impact on the short- and long-term incentives paid to the members of the Group Executive Committee.

A benchmarking analysis for the compensation of the Group Executive Committee in Switzerland was performed in 2024 by PwC. For this purpose, PwC used benchmark data from industrial companies from its existing database. The selection criteria for the peer group were reviewed and aligned with the group of companies used for the benchmark of the Board of Directors. The following companies fulfil the selection criteria and were therefore selected for comparison: Arbonia, Belimo, Bossard, Burckhardt Compression, Burkhalter, Bystronic, Daetwyler, Feintool, Forbo, Gurit, Huber+Suhner, Interroll, Kardex, Komax, Landis+Gyr, Meier Tobler, Phoenix Mecano, Rieter, Schweiter Technologies, Starrag Tornos, Tecan, VAT Group, Vetropack, and V-ZUG. A separate benchmarking analysis was provided by Willis Towers Watson in 2024 for the compensation of the member of the Group Executive Committee located in the United States taking into consideration similar criteria as for the members in Switzerland. These benchmarks support the Nomination and Compensation Committee to analyse the compensation of members of the Group Executive Committee and to decide on any adjustments for the 2026 business year.

To the top